Argument against stem cell research

The religious idea that a distinct stem cell is somehow wronged by its creation and destruction is something I regard.These therapies have the potential to save millions of lives and greatly reduce human suffering.While I suggest that the issues which will aid our progression to consensus on this topic do not lie in biology, science can aid our normative attribution of moral status for the embryo.These cells are highly differentiated, but maintain some ability to renew.Require the review by a national oversight body of research protocols whether the research is publicly or privately funded.Embryonic stem cells are blank cells that have not yet been categorized or programmed by the body, and can be prompted to generate any of the 220 human cell types.

This fact is no more evident than in the burgeoning field of stem cell research where therapeutic applications such as tissue and organ transplantation are being developed.However, our common-sense tells us that there is something about the embryo which instills it with value.Such human subjects have full moral status which cannot be diminished.

Biology – Extra Credit Research Paper: Stem Cells and Cloning

Enhanced pharmaceutical development towards better testing of drugs for safety and efficacy.You may indeed have "arguments" against stem cell research (which is quite hilarious,...The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Finding Common Ground.Likewise, using the full application of the multi-criterial principles, early embryos may be used to advance ES cell research, but the early embryos are not instrumentalized.

But even for objectors to ES cell research it does seem that closely held values are at times over-ridden in the name of other closely held values.Public Support for Embryonic Stem Cell Research For years, all polls report that the American public STRONGLY supports federal funding of embryonic stem cell research.More to the point, if the IVF embryo is a potential person, then it is morally impermissible to discard unwanted or unneeded IVF embryos.Gametes are donated from males and females with the understanding that the embryos will be used for research purposes solely.Another study published in August 2006 also indicates that differentiated cells can be reprogrammed to an embryonic-like state by introducing four specific factors.However, social utility is not always a sufficient grounding to justify actions.But the harms many are concerned with are the harms to justice and human rights which a strict utilitarianism seems unable to account for.

Ethics Analysis of the Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research

As regards valuing life, we certainly risk life in the pursuit of ending human rights atrocities.

Stem Cell Research - Campaign Life Coalition

It has some moral status, so allow stem cell research under certain conditions.However, instead of removing stem cells, the blastocyst is implanted in a woman and allowed to gestate to birth.It is common for people hold that animals have some rights and those rights are defined by the nature of our obligations which are based on some level of moral status.Examples are stem cells which allow new skin growth and the renewal of blood cells.

Against Embryonic Stem Cell Research - Catholic Planet

If parents or donors take offense at such destruction based on the symbolic value of life, it would be morally objectionable to force such destruction.The goal of this paper is to find a common ground from which we as a society may reasonably and faithfully deliberate about embryonic stem (ES) cell research.The main argument for ES cell research is that it will reduce human suffering and promote human well being, or the common good, by curing or eliminating many illnesses.Thus, from a practical perspective, reaching common ground on embryonic moral status is a central component to answering the question of whether to allow federal funding for ES cell research.Preference utilitarianism is a modification on classical utilitarianism which attempts to answer the objection that utilitarianism that attainment of pleasure and freedom from pain are the only things that people value.

Thus, it is research with ES cells versus adult cells which should be pursued.

Why would anyone be against stem cell research? - Quora

Congressional Testimony, Committee on Appropriations, Stem Cell Research, April 26, 2000, FDCH Congressional Testimony, Richard Salzman, Item No. 131243019310 from eMediaWorks, Inc.Though this is just the point of the CWA and others, the problem is that this could be the case whether the living creature is an animal, a child, an elderly person, or a disabled person.Thus, there are utilitarian reasons for adopting a non-classical utilitarian principle.

The use of embryonic stem cell in therapies may be fundamentally flawed.

Shaky arguments against stem cells - Georgetown University

In contrast, embryonic stem cell research is prohibited in Arkansas, Iowa, North and South Dakota and Michigan.And so, to my mind, the argument at the heart of the embryonic stem cell debate is the argument about human equality.Before discussing the specific types and sources of stem cells, I believe it is important to attempt to grasp the broad spectrum of implications which stem cell research can have in clinical applications.In contrast, there are reports of adult stem cells being successfully reintegrated into an autogenic animal.